On 24/07/2018 00:14, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Le 23/07/2018 à 22:46, Daniel a écrit :
On 23/07/2018 20:40, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Le 23/07/2018 à 20:26, Daniel a écrit :
With 3 pixels for heavy, I will have to take the width into account in table cells height computation, while I have conveniently decided to ignore it for now :)

Why is it that you would have to take it into account? So far zooming keeps the cell padding (emprty space around cell content) fixes. So nothing would overlap or so.

I do not know, I have not tried it. But I suspect thatit would seem too bold. I may try to do it if I find the time.

I think it will look good.

OK I see you point. You will not stop until I comply.

I was just wondering because, as I said, I experimented with this in CSS and found the result quite acceptable.

I did it now and don't like much. It is in though for your enjoyment.

Damn. No enjoyment for me at the moment since I cannot complile LyX. But if it lookes like with CSS (attached), I would have indeed enjoyed it.

Daniel

Reply via email to