Am Mittwoch, 20. Juni 2018 16:03:45 CEST schrieb Scott Kostyshak <skost...@lyx.org>: > On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 11:48:56AM +0000, Stephan Witt wrote: > > > > Still, I like the idea with 'M-m q' as prefix for extra bindings. > > > > Me too. :) > > Sounds good. In addition to "q", "j" and "k" seem to be free. Any reason > to choose one over the other?
Apart from not finding a word describing 'wide'? Only 'q' (for quad) suggests
something big.
From the alphanumeric there is also [0-79z] free.
> Any abstractions that come to mind that are related?
No, sorry
> For example, how
> about the following?
>
> \bind "M-m q i" "math-insert \iint"
> \bind "M-m q y" "math-insert \oiint"
> \bind "M-m q ~S-period" "math-insert \ddot"
> \bind "M-m q ~S-parenleft" "math-bigdelim bigl ( bigr )"
>
> Note that \ddot is already bound to <<">>, which does seem intuitive.
> Nonetheless, using "M-m q" would allow us to free <<">> if we wanted to
> use it for something else.
Yes.
> Scott
Kornel
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
