On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 12:05:08PM +0000, Kornel Benko wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 13. Juni 2018 14:52:43 CEST schrieb Scott Kostyshak 
> <[email protected]>:
> > > It is possible, the commit d6b21e2 does exactly that. Does not raise the 
> > > minimal cmake version, instead
> > > it copies some statements from original qt5_use_modules() into our 
> > > cmake-handling.
> > 
> > Ah good to know. So that would be option 1. Why do you prefer option 2?
> > Perhaps 3.1.0 is old enough that you don't think requiring it will
> > affect many people?
> > 
> 
> Yes, that is the idea.

Fine with me then. Unless Stephan disagrees (I can't tell, maybe wait
for clarification by seeing his response to Jürgen's recent response?),
I would say go with option 2 since you prefer that one.

Thanks for the explanations,

Scott

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to