On 14-Mar-2001 Andre Poenitz wrote:
> So I was pondering a "clean slate" approach. With that I do not mean
> "scrap everything" but to rebuilt the thing starting with sound foundation
> (the mathed array, iterators etc). Overall structure would remain the same,
> and code could be re-used.
> This is of course not feasible if 1.2 is due next Friday...
> Comments?
Why didn't we open a new branch for this? Lars you should have been the
first to propose this! IMO (very strongly) that we should open a branch
for the mathed changes and give Andre the write on the mathed directory.
So he could do whatever he needs to do until the thing stabilized and then
we can take it over to the HEAD branch. IMO this is easier for Andre and
other developers do have a working version!
Jürgen
--
-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._
Dr. Jürgen Vigna E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Italienallee 13/N Tel/Fax: +39-0471-450260 / +39-0471-450253
I-39100 Bozen Web: http://www.sad.it/~jug
-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._
No-one would remember the Good Samaritan if he had only had good
intentions. He had money as well.
-- Margaret Thatcher
