On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 07:56:15AM +0000, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > Am Sonntag, den 15.04.2018, 13:47 -0400 schrieb Scott Kostyshak: > > I see. So in this case should we remove \cprotect for situations that > > don't need it? > > Feel free to do that.
I don't mind doing it, but do you agree that it should be done? I have no knowledge of \cprotect, so I don't know if e.g. in the case of double frame, although it is not needed for the example file I provided, perhaps it is needed for another situation? I also have no idea if there is any disadvantage to using \cprotect when it is not needed. Perhaps you are suggesting that there is no disadvantage so it is not worth the 30 minutes to remove (and test) it? Scott
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
