Am Montag, 1. Januar 2018 um 11:34:30, schrieb Pavel Sanda <sa...@lyx.org> > Kornel Benko wrote: > > Am Montag, 1. Januar 2018 um 11:05:32, schrieb Kornel Benko <kor...@lyx.org> > > > > What is the target you you for running these, does it exist in > > > > autotools as > > > > well or is it cmake only? > > > > > > > Some are both. So for instance the lyx2lyx or check-(layout, filetools, > > Length, lstrings, ExternalTransform), tests are in autotools too. > > Others, like key-, export-, url-tests only in cmake-build. > > I see, only cmake. I guess "export-" is likely to be the one.
We did not export to tex yet. (Export to text did not lead to any visible
reaction from lyx, it was always successful).
> For the test this would need to be done:
>
> First, you take the .lyx file from trac and commit it as
> check_vcs_info_export.lyx.
> Then you export it as check_vcs_info_export.tex.stored and commit it as well.
>
> Then shell script like this is supposed to be the test for the bug #10835:
>
> git status >/dev/null
> if [ $? -eq 0 ] ; then exit 0 ; fi #don't try to run this test unless we are
> under git control
> lyx -e check_vcs_info_export.lyx # the file attached in trac
> diff -u check_vcs_info_export.tex check_vcs_info_export.tex.stored
> if ! [ $? -eq 0 ] ; then exit 1 ; fi #Export is different, check whether
> broken or not
> exit 0
>
> If you know how to add this easily to the cmake test suite it's IMHO worth it,
> if not forget about it...
>
> Pavel
No problems in cmake.
Will first insert the file to autotests/checklatexexports.
Kornel
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
