El 31.10.2017 a las 03:05, Richard Heck escribió:

I realized that Linux's monolithic kernel is a problem. Every device
driver needs to be part of the kernel.

This is a confusion. Linux supports kernel modules, which are the exact
Linux equivalent of a device driver, and which can be installed
separately from the kernel itself.

OK, but the WLAN driver is part of the kernel, not of a kernel module. This bug cost me many hours to investigate until I learned that I need to recompile the kernel with the fixed driver. I can also not e.g. use another version of the Mesa driver - it has to be compiled with the kernel too. So why are the drivers no modules?

I am a newbie and don't know the internals. I only noticed that the driver/kernel thing is for me a problem.

Someone in a forum explained me that the kernel needs to be
compiled using the fixed driver before it will work. But compiling the
kernel as a normal user? No chance.

In the Windows world, you do not even have this option. You have to wait
until Microsoft or the manufacturer decides to issue a patch.

No, there I can always go back to a previous driver version that is known to work. For my WLAN problem I found out that there were older driver versions without the bug but I could not use them.

Wait until they issue a patch. I'll bet that Linux distros are faster to do that
than Windows is.

That is my point. Waiting is a no go in real life. Every hour a person is not productive produces costs. That is why companies have 24h support contracts. I mean if you cannot e.g. transfer parts from your CAD to the CAM software of the machine, the machine is not running. This costs a lot of money every hour. There must be a reason why no production company I know uses Linux for other things than server applications. Maybe the driver architecture is one reason. I don't know.

I don't want to judge that one system is better or not. I am just looking around for an alternative that allows me to be as productive as with Windows. As I wrote I will keep Linux as second system.

regards Uwe

Reply via email to