Dear all, Because of the dashes and ZWSP situation, we do not produce an equivalent document in some cases (I'm still curious for a definition of what an "equivalent" document specifically means). For more information, see:
https://www.mail-archive.com/search?l=mid&q=osunpo%249f%241%40blaine.gmane.org This issue could be interpreted as data loss, and in the past we have had a rule of not releasing an rc if there is known data loss. My current opinion is that we should make an exception and just go forward with rc1 to get it out of the door. This way, we can get more testing while we debate more about the best way to resolve this issue after rc1. Do you support going forward with rc1 despite this data loss issue? I would need some explicit support before going forward, since we would be making an exception to an important rule. If instead you prefer to address the data loss issue before rc1 is released, please let me know if you suppport delaying rc1 until we at least provide a minimum fix for the issue. Thanks, Scott
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
