Am 05.10.2017 um 06:43 schrieb Scott Kostyshak <skost...@lyx.org>: > > On Wed, Oct 04, 2017 at 05:49:26AM +0000, Stephan Witt wrote: >> Am 01.10.2017 um 00:03 schrieb Scott Kostyshak <skost...@lyx.org>: >>> >>> Dear all, >>> >>> Qt 5.6.3 was released a week ago [1]. Do you agree that it makes sense >>> to go forward with 5.6.3 for the LyX 2.3.0 rc1 and final releases for >>> the Mac and Win binaries? Uwe, Stephan, I'm especially interested in >>> your thoughts. >> > >> I’m in favor of Qt 5.6.3 for LyX 2.3.0. > > Sounds good.
I’ve tried Qt 5.6.3 and it compiles and runs smoothly. >> With master I’ll see how it goes with Qt 5.9.2 or Qt 5.9.3. > > OK, only if it's not too much trouble. We could always just wait until > we get a situation where we think it would be useful for a user to try. ATM the name of the disk image contains qt5 only. That could and should be changed to allow different Qt versions for stable and bleeding edge builds. I’ve tried master with Qt 5.9.1 and this works too. Currently LyX from master is not usable for real work on Mac. The Qt version makes no difference here. Stephan
