Am 25.09.2017 um 15:00 schrieb Kornel Benko <kor...@lyx.org>: > > Am Montag, 25. September 2017 um 14:33:04, schrieb Enrico Forestieri > <for...@lyx.org> >> On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 09:31:45AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: >>> Le 25/09/2017 à 08:26, Stephan Witt a écrit : >>>> Now I wonder if it would be better to name the utility lyxconvert. >>>> It will be installed in /usr/local/bin or something like that? >>> >>> I was about to suggest this. And then do we want to honor version-suffix? I >>> guess not, but we might end up installing several utilities with the same >>> name. > > I'd say yes. The problem arises with package manager if I want different > lyx-versions installed. > ATM, I have lyx2.1, lyx2.2, lyx2.3 and lyx2.4 installed without conflicts.
The version-suffix needs to be passed to or be part of convertDefault.py then? Stephan > Cmake for debian seems (still) to be complicated in respect of creating > multiple distinct packages > needed for e.g. common lyx data. > >> Indeed. Maybe a specific install target would solve this. I mean it could >> be installed only if one explicitly issues "make install-lyxconvert". >> > > Kornel
