On Wed, May 03, 2017 at 11:29:30AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Le 02/05/2017 à 03:13, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : > > On Mon, May 01, 2017 at 07:21:18PM +0200, Guillaume MM wrote: > > > Le 01/05/2017 à 18:43, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit : > > > > We can define a lower bound for acceptable qt5 version like we do for > > > > python 3 vs 2. I would not want a crappy qt 5.1 on a system with a > > > > perfectly valid qt4.8. > > > > +1 > > I took a quick look at the configure code, but, considering the way the code > works, it seems a bit difficult to get the qt4 and qt5 versions. Enrico, > would you have an idea?
It should be possible, but I am short on time lately. > Having Qt5 as default would be trivial, though. In this case, I think that we should try to automatically configure for Qt4 if Qt5 is not available or not adequate. -- Enrico
