Am Dienstag, den 18.04.2017, 10:26 +0200 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes: > > Why? > > The fact is the you rely on an undocumented behavior of LyX to > obtain > what you want :)
I wouldn't count it undocumented. It is obvious that the special char inset outputs \ldots, so I need to redefine that macro. Would the special char output \dots, I would have re-defined that. In any case, we should not replace one macro by the other behind the back of users, just because they are equivalent by default (outside math, that is). > I read a bit about \ldots, \dots and friends (in the LaTeX > companion), > and it seems now that the situation is not very simple. It looks to > me > like a case where the SpecialChar inset should output different > things > depending on the language. I don't think so. Rather than that, we could consider to support the ellipsis (or xellipsis) package, or csquotes, or a combination of those. > What is a good reference on the subject? The ellipsis manual, for a start: http://mirrors.ctan.org/macros/latex/contrib/ellipsis/ellipsis.pdf > > JMarc > >
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
