Le 08/04/2017 à 19:38, Richard Heck a écrit :
I saw that. It looks like a good solution, and it makes the code no less readable.
It took me a lot of time to think about this. At some time my plan was to use try/catch, but I do not like adding such a construct in a situation where I know that it cannot trigger just for the sake of coverity.
I still think this is a bug/shortcoming of coverity. I should not have to do that.
JMarc
