Am Donnerstag, 2. März 2017 um 09:53:33, schrieb Guenter Milde <mi...@users.sf.net> > On 2017-03-01, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 10:06:43AM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote: > > >> > > Ignore missing glyphs in a test after TL update > >> > > > >> > > After a TL 2016 update, a test started to fail due to missing > >> > > glyphs. For more information, see the ML thread here: > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > https://www.mail-archive.com/search?l=mid&q=20170225203955.nas2qopy4l4ukyqq%40steph > >> > > >> > The test still fails for me. I tested manually and the missing glyphs > >> > are the only errors I get. What else should I do? > > >> Regexes in *Tests have to be specified for the whole test-names. > > > Thanks for fixing it. Tested and works well. > > However, it seems the test names don't contain any tag for ignored latex > errors: > > Test #1609: export/doc/UserGuide_dvi3_systemF > Test #1614: export/doc/UserGuide_pdf4_systemF > Test #1616: export/doc/UserGuide_pdf5_systemF > > Please add a tag to the test name to > > * help recognizing whether a regexp pattern works > > * indicate that we do some trickery to get the test working and there may > be a hidden issue. > > Günter
Please propose a name. Note though, that any label used in
ignoreLatexErrorsTests
will create different parameters for lyx executable.
Kornel
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
