On Sat, Dec 31, 2016 at 02:02:19PM +0000, Guenter Milde wrote: > >> Is this a concern or should it be ignored? > > > Can be ignored IMHO. > > I'd prefer to convert them to the respective Unicode characters and do the > replacement as preamble fallback macro definition.
Is there agreement this is the right thing to do? Scott
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature