Am Sonntag, 27. November 2016 um 15:58:00, schrieb Scott Kostyshak <skost...@lyx.org> > I think we've had this discussion in part before, but I could not find > the thread. > > We are almost at 0 failing tests except for the unreliable tests. I > think we should invert the unreliable tests that are failing, so that > the output from just a vanilla "ctest" command is clean. Since these > tests are unreliable, they might go from failing to passing without > meaning there was a regression, but I still prefer to run 'ctest' > instead of 'ctest -L export'.
You could make an alias ...
> When I add a pattern to invertedTests, it does not affect the unreliable
> tests. Can we change this?
We had some discussions about this. The current logic is:
ignored: we don't consider this test case
unreliable: we do not trust the result of the test
inverted: we know, the test fails
suspended: test fails, but we don't care for now
> Attached is the list of unreliable tests that I would like to invert.
And what should happen if the the changed tests do not fail here but fail at
your side?
I prefer not to invert.
> Scott
Kornel
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
