On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 07:02:31PM +0200, Guillaume Munch wrote:

> Le 23/10/2016 à 18:38, Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
> > commit dea5ba16de1b98d93cf30ab65119bc2364a7ac2b
> > Author: Enrico Forestieri <for...@lyx.org>
> > Date:   Sun Oct 23 18:23:41 2016 +0200
> > 
> >     Correctly track ulem commands with change tracking
> > 
> >     LyX assumes that everything in \lyxdeleted is struck out by ulem
> >     and increases the corresponding counter. However, deleted display
> >     math material is struck out using tikz. As we also take into
> >     account the deletion of underlined display math (in order to
> >     properly position such material vertically), we have to take
> >     care that the count is correct.
> 
> 
> This code (this commit and previous related commits) looks fragile to
> me. Did you not prefer to present a (full and tested) patch on the list
> and ask other people about it before committing?

Sorry, but I think that your comments are unwarranted and overzealous.
Moreover, this is something that you should pretend from a novice.
I think I know when something should be submitted for review before
committing. And you are not the official maintainer. Please, try
to be less off-putting. Thank you.

-- 
Enrico

Reply via email to