On 2016-09-10, Kornel Benko wrote: > Am Samstag, 10. September 2016 um 08:03:37, schrieb Guenter Milde > <mi...@users.sf.net> >> On 2016-09-09, Kornel Benko wrote:
Dear Kornel, >> * Can we rename "suspiciousTests" to "invertedTests", please? > Sure. Almost alike the original name has been (revertedTests) Fine (especially, as ctests calls the process "inversion"). >> * Do you still need the "suspendeTests"? What for? > Yes, we need them. This tests will not be executed with the call 'ctest > -L export'. suspendeTests were introduced for the "less urgent" test cases like files in the attic and export with Xe/LuaTeX and 8-bit TeX fonts when there were >100 test errors. In the meantime, we know the particular problem for most of the suspended tests. Some were fixed. Others require inversion (we know the problem is a wontfix or a bug on trac). How many of the suspendedTests are still failing? Do we really still need the suspension or could we lift it? If we want to keep it, it would be important to have a way to clearly define tests that are "suspended" AND "inverted". Thanks Günter
