On 2016-09-09, Kornel Benko wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, 8. September 2016 um 16:35:10, schrieb Guenter Milde
> <mi...@users.sf.net>
Dear Kornel,
>> ... actually the labeling mechanism is constructed so that inversion
>> takes precedence and prevents tagging with "unreliable".
>> Maybe this can be changed in an overhoul of the test setup...
> Yes, there is some discussion needed.
Maybe we can start with some simplification...
* Can we rename "suspiciousTests" to "invertedTests", please?
The "docstring" at the top of the file says:
# Regular expressions for tests that are known to fail
#
# Patterns will be automatically enclosed with '^' and '$'.
# Matching tests get the label "inverted"
# or (if also matching a pattern in "suspendedTests") "suspended".
# They get also the test-feature 'inverted', i.e.
# they are reported as failing if the export works without error.
* Do you still need the "suspendeTests"? What for?
I know that it was me who suggested this label.
However, the sublabel mechanism supersedes this by giving more
detailled info about problems and reasons for failure.
Thanks
Günter
