Le 13/07/2016 00:30, Richard Heck a écrit : > On 07/12/2016 07:07 PM, Uwe Stöhr wrote: > >> I could not follow the development the last days but I am opposed in >> renaming the document setting section "Output" to "Format". This >> section is about the output as the UserGuides also explains well: >> >> "Here you can define some output specifics for the current document:..." >> * Default Output Format: >> * Synchronize with Output >> * XHTML Output Options >> >> Therefore please revert the renaming and use change tracking to >> describe the new document settings option. > > This was discussed on the list, and no one objected, so far as I'm > aware. It's difficult to know where to put this option, and the Output > pane is a bit of grab-bag. >
Le 13/07/2016 00:32, Uwe Stöhr a écrit :
I hereby object. I am fine with the new feature as it was approved and with a description in the UserGuide I will get the docs in shape for 2.2.1 but I am against the renaming. This is then very misleading. I don't see a benefit but the opposite.
Sorry for the short notice. Is has been proposed four days earlier, probably a shorter delay than usual. "Format" is meant as a generalization of "Output", since the save transient properties is about the source rather than the outputs. What else do you suggest? For the manual, I can do an update quickly once we agree on a name. I can ensure that the User Guide is consistent with the more general name. Also, it is enough if I update the documentation on master, correct?
