On Sun, Jul 10, 2016 at 12:02:47PM +0200, Kornel Benko wrote:
> Am Sonntag, 10. Juli 2016 um 11:53:37, schrieb Enrico Forestieri 
> <for...@lyx.org>
> > 
> > I suggest that I commit the previous patch you posted and then you
> > can start from there.
> 
> Please no. I am convinced now that you were right about QPA_XCB, so I am not
> happy to commit something which is worse than I already have.

Ok, I'll wait for your commit. Then, please, update and post the patch
for cmake corresponding to the upcoming one from me, so that I can
commit it altogether.

> > As regards the name of variables, I suggest
> > that you simply rename QT_USES_X11 as HAVE_QT5_X11_EXTRAS, because
> > that is what really that test is for. If you need to use QT_USES_X11
> > somewhere else, it should be set to true if QPA_XCB is true, because
> > that is what really guarantees that X11 is the default backend.
> 
> I need QT_USES_X11 for creation of xvkbd.
> In QT4 we use QT_USES_X11 too, so renaming is not so good idea.

There is a misunderstanding here. What I was suggesting is that, for Qt5,
instead of QT_USES_X11 == Qt5X11Extras_FOUND, it should be
QT_USES_X11 == QPA_XCB_FOUND.

-- 
Enrico

Reply via email to