Kornel Benko wrote: > OK, starting on the list first. I can only comment on the cmake part. > > [A] detection of external dependencies > cmake does full detection IMHO > [B] create .rpm > cmake creates rpm, deb, > [E] create window package > don't know, we should ask Peter > [I] Reliability > why is scons higher then autotools? > cmake not reliable? > [J] Supported platforms > cmake supports all our platforms IMHO
This is an old table, I did not look at it (I re-used an existing page with a suitable name). > Commandline arguments for autotools and cmake (arguments for cmake) > custom archiver -DCMAKE_AR= > custom assemble -DCMAKE_AS= > custom C compiler -DCMAKE_CXX_COMPILER= > C++ runtime library -DLYX_STDLIB_DEBUG=ON > included boost -DLYX_EXTERNAL_BOOST=OFF > included hunspell -DLYX_3RDPARTY_BUILD=ON > included zlib -DLYX_3RDPARTY_BUILD=ON > installation prefix -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX= > version suffix in work > verbose compiler output -DLYX_QUIET=OFF Thanks. > I started the work. But I have to know, what should be affected by the > suffix. Suffix = xy > 1.) Installations directory (probably not) > 2.) Environment variables (like LYX_USERDIR_xy) > 3.) Package name > 4.) Program suffixes (lyx2.3.dev) > 5.) Data directory (for lyx-system-lib-dir) > 6.) Binary dir The same what is affected by autotools --with-version-suffix ;-) 2.) to 4.) definitely yes. What is the difference between 1 and 6)? My guess would be that this should not be affected. Georg
