On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 11:21:22AM +0200, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > Am Freitag, den 27.05.2016, 22:03 -0400 schrieb Scott Kostyshak: > > Since I've never done this before, can someone confirm that all we > > have > > to do is > > > > git checkout master > > git merge 2.3-staging > > > > ? > > What needs to be done first, in any case, is branching 2.2.x.
Is there a git reason this must be done first? I suppose it makes sense because that is the most important thing, but I'm wondering if you meant more that that. To branch 2.2.x can't we always do git branch 2.2.x 2.2.0 regardless of whether 2.3-staging was merged into master? Scott
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
