On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 09:40:46PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Le 24/05/16 à 21:31, Georg Baum a écrit : > > > For these reasons as well, I am hoping that for 2.3 the community of LyX > > > developers will choose to focus on qt >= 5.6. > > > > +1 > > > > However, I also agree with Jean-Marc: As long as keeping LyX compilable with > > qt 4.8 is close to zero effort we should support 4.8 as in "LyX compiles and > > does not crash immediately". > > In the foreseeable future, I will compile and use 4.8.x. Actually, I have no > real incentive to switch to Qt5 in Linux, so I will act as the resident > old-timer, until the cost is too high. > > I guess that one problem will be with the UI files.
I don't understand. Why would the UI files cause a problem? Do you mean because if we have to choose between a .ui that looks good on Qt 4 or looks good on Qt 5 we will choose Qt 5 and cannot use guards like in cpp files? Scott
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
