On 05/02/2016 08:45 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Sun, May 01, 2016 at 03:17:31PM +0100, Guillaume Munch wrote: >> Le 01/05/2016 00:26, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : >>> On Sat, Apr 30, 2016 at 03:44:48PM +0100, Guillaume Munch wrote: >>>> This is candidate for 2.2.0 and 2.1.5. >>> How noticeable and bad is the regression? >> On the one hand I did not notice any particular slowness, on the other >> hand it nullified the fix to #7138 which was a performance complaint. > OK, I suggest not for 2.2.0 then at this point. No one has noticed the > regression for 8 months.
Feel free to commit to 2.2.2-staging, then. Richard
