On Sun, May 01, 2016 at 08:38:58AM +0200, Stephan Witt wrote: > Am 01.05.2016 um 04:06 schrieb Scott Kostyshak <skost...@lyx.org>: > > > > On Sun, May 01, 2016 at 01:28:56PM +1200, Andrew Parsloe wrote: > >> On 1/05/2016 11:33 a.m., Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > >>> Le 27/04/2016 03:22, Andrew Parsloe a écrit : > >>>> Having just skimmed through an article on Wikipedia about cedillas, I > >>>> gather a cedilla is never attached to the letter 'i'. Nonetheless, when > >>>> I do attach one (using european.kmap, then ',' followed by 'i'), > >>>> everything looks fine in the main LyX window but in the Source Pane, LyX > >>>> format, the cedilla gets attached to the following letter. For instance, > >>>> writing'aei̧ou' with a cedilla under the 'i', all is fine in the main LyX > >>>> window (and the pdf) but when viewed in the Source Pane, the cedilla is > >>>> located under the 'o'. A quick experiment suggests 'i' is the only > >>>> letter for which this happens. It doesn't happen in 2.1.4 so it appears > >>>> to be a (tiny) regression. > >>> > >>> The source pane in under the responsability of Qt, AFAIK. It might be > >>> that you see a bug in Qt itself. What is the Qt version that your LyX > >>> uses? > >>> > >>> JMarc > >> It's Uwe's windows version of rc1, hence Qt 5.6 as I understand. (There > >> isn't anything about Qt version in the About LyX tabs. It would be a good > >> addition to the information there.) > > > > I thought we did have it. In Help > About, for me it says: > > > > Qt Version (run-time): 5.6.0 > > Qt Version (compile-time): 5.6.0 > > This is visible for development version only.
I see. Is the concern that we will confuse the user? Or that the information is useless because we should remember which Qt version was used for each release we provide? Scott
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
