Guenter Milde wrote: > > Dear Georg, > > thank you for your feedback. > > On 2016-04-03, Georg Baum wrote: > >> Concerning the list in section 2.2 I'd prefer it to stay simple. It >> starts to become too complicated for my taste. There is too much >> nesting, footnotes, and you have to read two times to understand how >> the line "Modified layouts and modules with a" is to be parsed. > > I simplified it a bit in 77fc7fe > (I Kept the nesting for "New valid value for an existing setting" to make > clear that this are example cases.) > > >> Finally, I'd also prefer it if this document is not used for indirect >> communication. If you want to discuss whether a new language needs a file >> format update, then we can do that on the list. I believe that this is >> one of the cases whithout consensus, since this issue has been discussed >> in the past IIRC. > > Yes. exchange of arguments should be on the list. > (I kept a note that this point is under discussion - similar to what was > in the "new layout" item before we decided to remove it from this list.) > > Feel free to edit - this is still work in progress.
Thanks. Currently I am too busy with layout translations, I'll have a detailed look later. Georg
