On Fri, Apr 01, 2016 at 08:39:14AM +0000, Guenter Milde wrote: > Dear all, > > > On 2016-04-01, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > > Günter has proposed layout patches to respond to changes in updated > > LaTeX class files at the following two threads: > > (acmsiggraph) > > https://www.mail-archive.com/search?l=mid&q=ndgr7a%24kuf%241%40ger.gmane.org > > (aastex6) > > https://www.mail-archive.com/search?l=mid&q=ndj02g%244ht%241%40ger.gmane.org > > For these patches to go in, we would need a consensus on the decision: > > New layouts and layouts with new styles/insets: > > *do* require a file format change (status quo, see Development.lyx) > > or > > do *not* require a file format change if no lyx2lyx action is required. > > > For the pros and cons see the recent thread on a policy for layout > updates. For consequences, see the alternatives below.
From what I understand, you, Richard, and Georg are the ones who have participated the most in the layout discussion and you are mostly in agreement with each other, so I'm fine with whatever you all decide as far as 2.2.0. Thanks for your help on this complicated issue, Scott
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
