On 03/25/2016 05:13 AM, Kornel Benko wrote: > We should select different layout naming to be prepared for the case > that someone creates later a new foo1.cls file. Maybe our new layout > file names could have versioning independent of the underlying cls.
Any such scheme will face some version of this problem, but of course a more refined scheme would be better. But note that it isn't that big an issue. It would lead to a naming inconsistency, but it wouldn't cause actual problems in LyX. The foo1.layout file will still use foo.cls (because of the \DeclareLaTeXClass line), and we can still have a realfoo1.layout file that uses foo1.cls (for the same reason). Richard
