On 2016-03-20, Kornel Benko wrote: > Am 19. März 2016 um 23:12:32, schrieb Guenter Milde <mi...@users.sf.net>
Dear Kornel, thanks for the patch. >> I still suggest that labels for "mathmacros", "examples", >> "templates", "manuals" are not required and without them the test system >> would become easier to understand and use. > Like the attached? This is a step in the right direction: "location labels" dont interfere with other labels in the test names and don't slip inbetween label and sublabel. There are, however still problems: #> ctest --print-labels Test project /usr/local/src/lyxtest All Labels: -1autotests:export -1autotests:export:inverted:multilingual -1autotests:export:inverted:todo ... The -1 should not become part of the label. Actually, IMV the location should not become part of a label: A user trying to find out which labels exist is overwhelmed by the long list. And there are so many duplications: For example, there are 12 different labels with "todo": autotests:export:inverted:todo autotests:export:load:lyx2lyx:inverted:todo autotests:suspended:todo examples:export:inverted:todo examples:suspended:todo manuals:export:inverted:todo mathmacros:export:inverted:todo mathmacros:export:load:lyx2lyx:inverted:todo mathmacros:suspended:todo templates:export:inverted:todo templates:suspended:todo load:inverted:todo where 2 would do: inverted:todo suspended:todo Suggestion: a) use a separate label for the location, or b) don't crate "location labels" at all. I prefer b), because it is much simpler. Günter
