On Tue, Feb 02, 2016 at 07:30:35PM +0000, Guillaume Munch wrote: > Le 24/01/2016 11:57, Enrico Forestieri a écrit : > >> > >> > >>Thanks, I tested the patch and it works well. The new method > >>GuiPainter::path method seems safe because it is very similar to other ones > >>in GuiPainter. The other changes look ok, as for the symbol choice Richard > >>seemed positive about it. Please commit it, you have my +1. > > > >I (reluctantly :) committed it with some small tweaks to make it more > >appealing. > > > > > Why do you say reluctantly? I have already given my opinion on this new > symbol, and cannot argue on matters of taste if there is a majority of > voiced opinions in its favour. So I hope that at least both you and > Richard like it.
I think that the previous symbol was somewhat less intrusive. However, given that we will see it only when converting from old documents and in cases where it can be either safely turned into its cousin or simply eliminated, this point is moot. -- Enrico
