On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 04:40:56PM -0500, Richard Heck wrote: > On 01/21/2016 04:07 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote: > > Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > >> So is it a problem that compiling in C++11 mode is broken with gcc 4.6? I > >> would guess not. > > I guess it also depends how much space for error we have... > > Richard, do you plan to release one intermediate 2.1.x or you just waiting > > for the final one? > > How far out do we realistically think 2.2.0 is? I am thinking end of > February, but if it gets delayed any further we might think about an > intermediate release.
I think end of February is realistic. Beta should be soon, just need Guillaume's set of patches to git a final review, and Georg also is trying to look into an issue that Stephan has reported. After beta I do not think developers are planning many non-trivial commits so whether we achieve end of February for a final release will depend on what issues our beta testers find and on how long it takes us to fix those issues. Scott
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
