On Tue, 13 Feb 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> 1. Don't assume the system grep understands -E. Use egrep instead.
Agreed. But do we really need egrep or is grep sufficient?
> 2. Search for nawk-equivalent (awk cannot handle syntax in
> po/Makefile.in.in)
Your patch is not against latest CVS. The first chunk of
po/Makefile.in.in has been rewritten already to only use sed (no awk or
grep).
The second one has also changed slightly.
I guess you have used 1.1.6fix? as your base? My patches to
po/Makefile.in.in haven't been applied to that tree yet. Since noone has
complained about them yet they should be safe to introduce, JMarc.
> - awk -F '"' '$$2 {printf "_(\"%s\");\n", $$2}' $(top_srcdir)/lib/languages >> $@
> + $(NAWK) -F '"' '$$2 {printf "_(\"%s\");\n", $$2}' $(top_srcdir)/lib/languages
>>> $@
What doesn't awk handle that nawk does?
> - awk 'BEGIN {FS= ":"} {print $$1}' | \
> + $(NAWK) 'BEGIN {FS= ":"} {print $$1}' | \
And here?
Allan. (ARRae)
