Am 13. Januar 2016 01:46:35 MEZ, schrieb Scott Kostyshak <skost...@lyx.org>: >On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 01:31:59AM +0100, Peter Kümmel wrote: >> Am 13. Januar 2016 00:32:11 MEZ, schrieb Scott Kostyshak ><skost...@lyx.org>: >> >Dear all, >> > >> >There is a question of whether we should release our binary for >Windows >> >compiled against Qt 5.5.1 or 5.6.0. >> > >> >> It is not very complicated to switch between these two versions. So >just let see how the timing becomes. > >Although I am very open since I am not knowledgeable on this topic, I >would be quite hesitant to switch between 5.5.1 and 5.6.0 after beta. I >am not worried about how easy it is to switch in terms of compiling >(that is a separate set of concerns that I am not convinced are >trivial). I'm worried about Qt bugs. I have seen many Qt bugs affect >LyX. But I suppose we can have that discussion if the circumstances >permit (e.g. LyX has not been released by the time Qt 5.6.0 final has >been released, and the bug Enrico sees was fixed in Qt 5.6.0 final).
Yes, this bug looks like a show stopper for 5.6. > >Scott
