Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Le 10/01/16 22:17, Guillaume Munch a écrit : >> Since you have gotten a +1 from somebody else, sure. I was not so sure >> myself, so I wanted to offer an alternative that was sure to be safe. I >> think this will have to be done nevertheless, so I am going to keep it >> for later. > > Indeed Georg's comment looks like a bona fide +1.
Yes, it was meant like that (I promise to be explicit in the future). > I agree though that the refactoring is needed, although I am not sure > why you prefer to create a new Toc.h header. Actually the merging of > headers was done at the time to speed up compilation, I think. I agree as well. Inheriting like that from std containers is not nice. Georg
