Am Mittwoch, 6. Januar 2016 um 14:15:22, schrieb Stephan Witt <st.w...@gmx.net>
> Am 06.01.2016 um 13:35 schrieb Peter Kümmel <syntheti...@gmx.net>:
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Am 03.01.2016 um 20:05 schrieb Georg Baum:
> >> 
> >> So far we have never released any 64bit windows binary. This is fine, since
> >> 64bit windows can execute 32bit binaries, and nobody complained yet about
> >> LyX hitting the 32bit memory limit (around 3.5 GB on windows). I would not
> >> switch to 64bit at this time, since this can introduce subtle bugs
> >> (unfortunately the 64 C++ memory model differs on linux and windows, e.g.
> >> long is 64bit on linux but 32bit on windows, so the fact that we have
> >> working 64bit linux builds does not guarantee us working windows 64bit
> >> builds).
> >> 
> > 
> > This is the patch to build for 64bit Windows (with msvc15)
> > 
> > https://github.com/syntheticpp/lyx/commit/b249309e84957df512c31b3e5087fbaada681ee9
> 
> line 175 of src/support/convert.cpp is:
> +string convert<string>(unsigned ´long long ul)
> 
> Are you sure? 
> 
> I cannot test - but it seems to be a wrong ´ in front of the first long.
> 
> Stephan

Is there a reason why we cannot use int64_t instead of long long?

        Kornel

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Reply via email to