-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Le 14/12/2015 22:14, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : > On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 09:35:57PM +0100, Georg Baum wrote: >> Scott Kostyshak wrote: >> >>> Interesting idea. In this case, a git bisect would be worthless >>> so I will wait before doing it. Is there a way to test your >>> theory? If we use 'touch' to update a file and then try? >> >> I'd think so. > > I have no idea why, but the attached patch seems to fix 'make > distcheck' for me. > > Can it go in?
It is strange that it can fix anything. But it should definitely go in. Did you check whether there are other missing entries? JMarc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJWcBOyAAoJEM5u12ge/IfVvucP/2HmTB/jKivbnCHnULt1QZni OEsw1q4SC6Sxizdcc4Ha4VEnY9ZFdpKJfKwCX0sK8AbVGAUPHY+k2bddXhmyJVu/ TujFx/m0ciehOYJ9/4Wxznu6vOYidm9UqP4l+GoOyLqPrhT8BzSeB0JC3PhSwA1C b4/JwQzx7U5DjPSNB8HC98C65J+MJx34uQ0pqRhBiit8JbU9AZu7TArvtalDzUWw 8xv9lV1jFAN8CTABfizq/89IDWhKbzmndDKpe8NgEjpCBtgm54e8K9TLiFlhIG5i x1e0RXvut5MpMtKpG9V+0oOjqJEw9yst3u2pvIUZT1DDVY1Gqn3uWCu4TAoDMkQw t1cv0npixIaKV4ZMmx2QrVhIZP5o9fznMH+3PtMrgrmhQJIo4YaqYuotvojPkS2w Cm0yl4Rg9J8S413D9UO4Au2iXGuVg0cn1jLOe+j2bZxOezpxQVDMkcT2bV3cfSp0 iN5EKUE6ILDHw+CP5vHWWYlRLo5yvQAbpbY+F8eqj3H3w38A1mtCOaO3fG8CAwfI 1r6On5IbVmwNXzwfG5u3mnP3uC3gWup4UWmjMo3ubL9TyWoWR9UGqsoxMJqYJdOB yR76Qau5Mi5VEFuaHqYP1fA+9DnHntUbguEc0rJgKPNTnbmTnoe19NbGAeZqLrUq uBJVnw7BN7ky3wcQJpoG =7tYM -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
