Am Sonntag, 6. Dezember 2015 um 05:25:35, schrieb Uwe Stöhr <uwesto...@web.de> > Am 04.12.2015 um 09:58 schrieb Guenter Milde: > > >> If I understand correctly, you want all tests with > >> doc/.*/.*systemF > >> being ignored. > > > >> If that should be so, than OK. > >> If not, please help the docs be in good compilable shape. > > > > I see it a bit different: > > > > * The main purpose of the manuals is user documentation. For this, > > compilability to the default output format is required. > > What I can do is to set an explicit export format if XeTeX and/or LuaTeX > fails without system fonts. > > For the compilation with system fonts we should do nothing since we > cannot know the system status of the user. If someones desperately needs > to view a doc file with his own fonts, it is his duty to select fonts > that will work.
We are speaking about tests IMHO, not some user's font selection.
We are not testing with arbitrary system fonts.
If the system font is specified in lyx, we use it.
Else we select (for most languages) the font which should be good for that
language,
and is free to download.
> So in my opinion
> doc/.*/.*systemF
> can in general be ignored for all docs and for many examples files too.
> For template files however, it is sensible to check also system font
> compilation.
>
> > @Uwe: if the manuals are designed for pdflatex export, I suggest to set
> > the default output format in the documents. Then we would have just one
> > "standard export format".
>
> Agreed. I will try to find the time and do so.
>
> regards Uwe
Kornel
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
