On 11/08/2015 02:57 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
On Sun, Nov 08, 2015 at 08:34:53PM +0100, Georg Baum wrote:
Scott Kostyshak wrote:
Thanks for working on this, Georg. As far as I'm concerned, whatever you
and Günter decide is fine with me since you two seem to be the only ones
that understand what should happen. As far as the tests, I don't have a
strong preference. I think we should try to get the tests to reflect
real user scenarios as much as possible so what you propose sounds
reasonable to me. Let's see what Kornel thinks.
Here comes an implementation of the duplicate font settings. This is needed
independently of the automatic setting, so I wanted to complete this first.
The patch is almost completely mechanical. The needed settings are
duplicated. The only non-mechanical change is in the GUI logic: The set of
settings currently not selected by the "use non-TeX fonts" check box is
stored in some new member variables, and if the check box is toggled they
are exchanged with the contents of the GUI elements. No documentation change
is needed, the only thing the user may notice is that toggling "use non-TeX
fonts" does no longer throw away settings.
OK to apply? When?
If you want this in alpha, go ahead and put it in now. If you are
indifferent, then I have a slight preference to wait until after alpha
is out. Your choice.
I have just a few more items on my checklist (thanks to Vincent for the
help) before releasing alpha. I am also waiting for access to the FTP
(my IP needs to be whitelisted). If it takes too long to get access,
then I will just ask Richard (or someone else) for the favor of
uploading the tar ball.
I'll send another message tomorrow if nothing has happened by then.
Richard
