Liviu Andronic wrote: > ALL other bugs fall into two categories: somewhat important if a devel > is interested in the bug, not important if no one will be bothered to > address it. This is why I find Guillaume's proposal unworkable, if I > understood it correctly, in the sense that: How do we define which > inconvenience is important and which is not? The lack of horizontal > scrolling was a major inconvenience for many users for a decade or so, > yet no one looked at it until recently because it required major > surgery; having it in High priority may or may not have been useful... > But if it had been in High priority all this time, then it would have > rendered the priority meaningless, too (same issue as with milestones > above).
OK, I understand. Now your proposal makes much more sense to me and is probably the best compromise. Georg
