On Tue, Feb 06, 2001 at 11:17:50AM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > I'm a bit unsure too. Dekel, is the bookmark code only a "side-effect" > or is it that you do not want to separate the patch in two? We already > had one new bug in 1.1.6fix1, and I really do not want to see another > one! It is hard to separate the patch to two. While it is possible to do, it involves a lot of work, and the chance of introducing a new bug is probably greater than using the patch as is. > Where can I see the patch? Same for the bib stuff. I'd rather not have http://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org/msg18611.html > the multiple bibliography stuff, since if we decide to change the way > it works before 1.2.0, we will be bound by what appeared in 1.1.6fixX. I can disable the multiple bibliographies code with #ifdef's
- Weird cross reference bug Amir Karger
- Re: Weird cross reference bug Angus Leeming
- Re: Weird cross reference bug Dekel Tsur
- Re: Weird cross reference bug Angus Leeming
- Re: Weird cross reference bug Dekel Tsur
- Re: Weird cross reference bug Lars Gullik Bjønnes
- Re: Weird cross reference b... Dekel Tsur
- Re: Weird cross referen... Lars Gullik Bjønnes
- Re: Weird cross referen... Dekel Tsur
- Re: Weird cross referen... Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
- Re: Weird cross referen... Dekel Tsur
- Re: Weird cross referen... Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
- Re: Weird cross referen... Dekel Tsur
- Re: Weird cross referen... Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
- Re: Weird cross referen... Dekel Tsur
- Re: Weird cross referen... Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
- Re: Weird cross reference bug Dekel Tsur
- Re: Weird cross reference bug Angus Leeming
- Re: Weird cross reference bug Amir Karger
- Re: Weird cross reference bug Dekel Tsur
- Re: Weird cross reference bug Garst R. Reese