Le 08/09/2015 04:21, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
The problem is that we do not have a reliable value for DPI as I understand
it.
Is this still a pending issue?
Yes.
What is the width proposed by Qt determined by and what is it meant for?
It is the width for underlines. It turns out that a width that is good
enough for a continuous black line may not be good for a dotted red
line, as I understand it.
I can try to adapt/redo my patch against current trunk if we decide to
continue this way. One advantage is that we would do underlines
correctly (larger for large fonts). We can keep spell lines as they are
now. However, I seem to remember that this thread was initiated by
Kornel wanting larger spell markers (with current code).
JMarc
