On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 10:17:15AM +0200, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > 2015-06-18 9:50 GMT+02:00 Scott Kostyshak <skost...@lyx.org>: > > > > Not if they are set up properly. > > > > Do you think that the pre-requisites for triggering #9633 are rare? > > That bug seems to have bit many of our own documents. > > > > No, I mean that if the language package is properly set, the document will > continue to work. In any case, what I mean is that LuaTeX/polyglossia > brings in no _new_ bug AFAICS.
OK, I will not push any further because I trust you on these issues much more than myself since you know a lot more than I do and thus are best positioned to balance the advantages against the disadvantages. I will just say two more things: although this commit does not introduce a new bug, it exposes an existing bug and from the perspective of the user this is just as bad. And assuming that all LyX documents are properly set up is not a good idea in my opinion. But I am an economist so I make a living off of unrealistic assumptions :) Scott
