On Fri, Jun 05, 2015 at 05:11:45PM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 3:40 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <lasgout...@lyx.org> > wrote: > > Le 05/06/2015 09:14, Enrico Forestieri a écrit : > >> > >> A possible way out would be outputting all the macros once at the > >> beginning of the file, such that they are seen by all snippets, and then > >> the specific one appearing in a math inset (as done in the patch I was > >> proposing). I'll have a look whether this can be done in a simple way. > > > > > > Isn't it possible to output them as they are output by the normal latex > > export? Of course, this would mean that creating previews would be a very > > different process, more like a special version of our latex output code, > > instead of some registration done by the insets themselves. > > I am unsure which of the above messages relate to whether I should > revert 73460423 and 6ac04e21. In any case, I am planning to revert > because of JMarc's comment that the commits "modify a full buffer just > in the middle of a dispatch action". I leave a day for an objection > (in case someone points out I misunderstood something) and then I will > revert.
Reverted in stable at 9ea4fc6e and in master at 580947bf. Scott
