Am Freitag, 29. Mai 2015 um 21:59:16, schrieb pdv <pdvissch...@edpnet.be> > On 29/05/15 20:10, Kornel Benko wrote: > > Am Freitag, 29. Mai 2015 um 19:52:03, schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes > > <lasgout...@lyx.org> > >> Le 28/05/2015 23:23, pdv a écrit : > >>> Starting with commit b596330 lyx fails to compile with cmake/xcode. > >>> This seems to be due to "boost::next" having been replaced by "next" and > >>> this generates "ambiguous call to 'next'" semantic issues, one of the 2 > >>> possibilities being the "next" in lyxalgo.h mentioned in this message. > >>> So this might be related to this; > >>> I expected LYX_USE_CXX11 to be set (with the later commits that is), but > >>> that's not the case; > >>> When I manually define LYX_USE_CXX11 the problems with "next" go away, > >>> but similar and much more semantic issues surface with "bind". > >> > >> I suspect that there is a problem with clang, which implements parts of > >> C++11 even when not in c++11 mode. > >> > >> Patrick, what are the options passed to cmake? What is your clang version? > >> > >> JMarc > > > > Good idea JMarc. > > > > Patrick, do you use '-DLYX_ENABLE_CXX11=ON' in cmake call? (Default is OFF) > > > > Kornel > > > > (I'm using the CMake GUI and I define the macro's directly) > Previously I defined LYX_USE_CXX11 and this showed up in config.h but > failed; > > Defining instead LYX_ENABLE_CXX11 solves it. > > Thanks > > Patrick
The variable LYX_USE_CXX11 is set by cmake while checking for the appropriate
compiler flags
to enable c++11.
But this is only done if LYX_ENABLE_CXX11 is set by the user (you).
Kornel
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
