2015-03-15 18:47 GMT+01:00 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes: > We do not have a use case yet, but you commit that minus the part that > defines the set<> version.
I am not really sure it makes sense if we just need VectorFromString, since the change replaces push_back with insert in the template (since Set does not have push_back), and this operation is apparently a bit more expensive (so I learned). > Actually, it seems to me that you do not Need the String template > parameter. Container::value_type should do the trick, IMO. > OK. This somewhat exceeds my current C++ expertise, so I'd rather let you (or someone else) do that change. Jürgen > > JMarc > >
