On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 6:41 PM, Cyrille Artho <c.ar...@aist.go.jp> wrote:
> The challenge here is that we cannot really verify that the output document > is correct (because that would require a detailed specification). However, > we can inspect the output manually once, and then use it as a reference > against unexpected changes, as suggested earlier. > > This may not sound as convincing as actual output verification, but it is > really very helpful in practice, and easy to set up. Thanks for clarifying. This is exactly what I had in mind. Scott
