On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 5:07 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <lasgout...@lyx.org> wrote: > Le 29/07/2014 10:24, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : > >>> I have a theory, I will test it first. Bisecting is still quite time >>> consuming. >> >> >> OK, let me know if your theory is rejected. > > > Well, my theory is indeed proven false. If you have time to bsect, it will > be appreciated. No hurry though, I will probably not have time until > September.
Bisect lead me to e1c4cb71 but I´m not sure because on some of the "good commits" the line breaking did not work correctly, which I think is important to reproducing the bug. So in summary, I'm not confident that e1c4cb71 is the *first* bad commit (because I'm not confident when marking "good" commits), but I am confident it is "bad" in the sense that I can reproduce the bug. Scott
