On 07/01/2014 04:50 PM, Georg Baum wrote:
Richard Heck wrote:
That was what I was thinking, too. Just guessing at this point.
Another wild guess: Since the backtrace shows autoSave(), and autoSave()
runs in a separate thread and operates on the cloned buffer: Could the non-
thread-safety of the cloning business be the real problem? At least I saw
some comments about that in Buffer.cpp, maybe there are more places where
the cloned buffer is used in an unsafe way?
It may be possible to verify whether this guess is true by doing autoSave()
in a loop, and then trying to do any other editing operations at the same
time.
There was a report from someone who did not have autosave enabled.
Richard
