On 15/04/14 05:14, Richard Heck wrote:
> Can you remind me why we need "fixedinmasterandstable" anyway? and
> not just "fixedinmaster fixedinstable", as we had before? I know we
> discussed this....
And can anyone please remind everyone else what master and stable exactly are?
Just asking, as due to the current long permanence in the new 2.x-staging
branches,
so I confess I'm a bit lost here with how many branches are needed during
release
finalizations. Better, would be to note this down on the devel wiki somewhere.
Thanks,
T.
